Why AI Should Not Be Used for Course Development: The Looming Threat of Copyright Infringement

Why AI Should Not Be Used for Course Development: The Looming Threat of Copyright Infringement

The rise of artificial intelligence (AI) has revolutionised various sectors, including education. From generating content to automating administrative tasks, AI offers exciting possibilities. However, when it comes to course development, the use of AI presents significant risks that cannot be overlooked. One of the most critical issues is the potential for copyright infringement. AI-generated content frequently draws from existing information, often including copyrighted materials without proper attribution or permission. As universities and Registered Training Organisations (RTOs) consider integrating AI into course development, the legal and ethical risks associated with this technology must be carefully monitored.

This article explores why the use of AI in course development should be approached with caution and why legal experts should be involved to ensure compliance with copyright laws. By delving into the issues surrounding copyright infringement, we highlight the importance of limiting the use of AI in academic content creation.


AI and Copyright Infringement: A Growing Concern

The process by which generative AI tools like ChatGPT, GPT-4, and other models operate is fundamentally based on training algorithms to analyse vast amounts of existing data. This data often includes books, articles, research papers, websites, and other written works—some of which are protected by copyright. When an AI system generates content, it does so by drawing from this vast pool of information. While AI tools attempt to create original content, they sometimes inadvertently replicate entire sentences, paragraphs, or even ideas from copyrighted sources.

Unintentional Plagiarism: The AI Challenge

AI systems, despite their advanced capabilities, do not have an inherent understanding of intellectual property laws. They cannot distinguish between public domain content and copyrighted material. As a result, there have been numerous instances where AI-generated content has included text that mirrors existing works too closely, raising concerns of plagiarism and copyright infringement.

This issue becomes particularly concerning when AI is used to develop educational materials. Course development involves creating content that will be distributed to students, often on a large scale. If any part of the material is found to be in violation of copyright laws, the educational institution or RTO could face legal consequences, including hefty fines and damage to its reputation.


Copyright Holders on Alert: The Legal Risks for Institutions

The risk of copyright infringement is not just a hypothetical concern—it is a growing issue. Many original authors and copyright holders are beginning to recognise that their work is being used without permission in AI-generated responses. As more content is generated using AI, the likelihood of legal disputes increases.

The Burden of Proof

One of the challenges faced by institutions using AI for course development is that it may be difficult to prove that the content generated by AI is entirely original. If an original author or copyright holder identifies their text in an AI-generated course module, they have the right to pursue legal action for copyright infringement. In such cases, the educational institution or RTO could be held accountable, as the use of AI does not absolve them of responsibility for ensuring the originality of the content.

High-Profile Cases of AI Copyright Infringement

There have already been instances where AI-generated content has raised legal red flags. For example, several authors and publishers have filed lawsuits against AI developers, claiming that their works were used to train AI models without their consent. These lawsuits highlight the grey area that currently exists between AI-generated content and intellectual property rights.

As AI continues to develop and be used in more sectors, it is only a matter of time before more copyright holders recognise their work in AI-generated outputs. This could lead to a wave of legal battles, especially if educational institutions and RTOs continue to use AI without adequate legal oversight.


The Ethical Dilemma: Undermining Creativity and Academic Integrity

Beyond the legal risks, there is also an ethical dimension to consider. Course development is a creative process that relies on the expertise and knowledge of educators, researchers, and subject matter experts. When AI is used to generate course content, it can undermine the creativity and intellectual labour of these professionals. AI systems may not respect the nuances of academic integrity, originality, and proper attribution—values that are central to education.

 

The Risk to Critical Thinking

By relying on AI to generate course materials, there is a risk that the critical thinking and analysis that go into developing educational content will be devalued. AI-generated materials may lack the depth and contextual understanding that comes from human expertise. This could lead to the dissemination of content that is not only legally questionable but also academically inferior.

Moreover, if AI systems are generating content based on existing works, there is a risk that course materials will become repetitive and derivative, offering little in the way of new insights or perspectives. This not only diminishes the value of the educational experience for students but also compromises the institution's commitment to original research and thought leadership.


Why AI Use in Course Development Should Be Limited

Given the potential for copyright infringement and the ethical concerns surrounding AI use in education, it is clear that the use of AI in course development should be limited and carefully monitored. While AI tools can be valuable for automating certain tasks, such as administrative functions or data analysis, the creation of course content requires a much more thoughtful and human-centred approach.


The Role of Legal Experts in AI Monitoring

To avoid legal risks, educational institutions and RTOs should involve legal experts in the process of AI adoption for course development. These experts can help ensure that AI-generated content is thoroughly vetted for potential copyright issues before it is used in educational settings.

Legal experts can:

  • Review AI-generated content to identify any potential instances of copyright infringement.
  • Establish guidelines for the use of AI in course development, ensuring that all content meets legal and ethical standards.
  • Provide training to educators and course developers on how to use AI responsibly, with a focus on intellectual property rights and copyright law.
  • Implement systems of accountability, ensuring that any content generated by AI is subject to the same standards of originality and integrity as content created by human educators.

Monitoring and Regulation: A Necessary Step

The use of AI in educational settings is likely to increase, but without proper regulation, it could lead to significant legal and ethical challenges. Universities and RTOs must establish strict monitoring protocols to ensure that AI is used responsibly. This includes:

  • Limiting AI use in areas where copyright infringement is most likely, such as course development and content creation.
  • Implementing clear policies that outline when and how AI tools can be used, and ensuring that all staff are aware of the legal implications of using AI-generated content.
  • Regular audits of AI-generated materials to ensure compliance with intellectual property laws.

AI and Course Development—Proceed with Caution

While AI offers many exciting possibilities for the future of education, its use in course development comes with significant risks. Copyright infringement is a major concern, as AI tools often pull from existing content, sometimes without proper attribution or permission. For universities and RTOs, the legal and ethical implications of using AI for course development are too significant to ignore.

The solution lies in limiting AI use in course creation and ensuring that any AI-generated content is carefully monitored by legal experts. By taking a proactive approach to the legal risks associated with AI, educational institutions can protect themselves from copyright disputes and ensure that the content they provide to students is both original and high-quality.

AI has the potential to revolutionise education, but only if it is used responsibly and with a clear understanding of the legal and ethical boundaries. For course development, it is essential that the human touch remains at the forefront, with AI playing a supporting role rather than taking over the creative and intellectual process entirely.
Back to blog