Validation and Moderation Services

We offer both independent assessment validations services and Independent assessment moderation services to TAFE, community colleges, enterprise RTOs and private RTOs.
Independent assessment validation will save you a lot of time, and allow you to access expert Industry consultants, resource validators and subject matter experts.
As per ASQA’s Standards for RTOs 2015, your RTO’s validation plan must ensure:
Every training product on your RTO’s scope of registration undergoes validation at least once every five years.
You validate at least 50 per cent of the training products in the first three years of that cycle.
You may need to validate certain training products more often where specific risks have been identified, for example, if your RTO’s industry consultation identifies areas of particular risk. ASQA may from time to time determine specific training products that must have particular attention paid to them and this advice would be published to www.asqa.gov.au..

Did you know?

1 %
of RTOs audited by ASQA were non-compliant against Standard 1
1 %
of RTOs audited by ASQA were found non-compliant against assessment practices
1 %
of RTOs audited by ASQA were found non-compliant against having qualified and competent trainers and assessors
1
complaints has been received by ASQA about RTOs' assessment practices
ASQA reported the following in their 2015 – 2016 annual report :
“compliance with standards 1 Responsive to Industry and learners needs and 2 Quality assurance is noticeably lower than that for the other six standards. This is an area of concern for ASQA as these two standards relate to meeting the needs of industry and learners and ensuring the quality of training and assessment”
Only 20.7% met compliance standards initially while only 71.2 passed at finalisation stage in Standard 1 Responsive to Industry and learners needs
Only 20.1% met compliance standards initially while only 72.6 passed at finalisation stage in Standard 2 Quality assurance

Source – ASQA Annual Report 2015-16, Page 55, Figure 8 Levels of compliance by standard, 1 July 2015 – 30 June 2016

https://www.asqa.gov.au/sites/g/files/net2166/f/ASQA_Annual_Report_2015-16.pdf

Validation Moderation
Assessment Quality/ Management Type A quality review/continuous improvement process involving: A quality control process involving:
Explanation: Checking that the assessment tools, methods, judgement, evidence and processes to ensure that the training product meet:
  • Principles of Assessment – i.e. valid, reliable, flexible and fair
  • Rules of Evidence – i.e. valid, authentic, current and sufficient
  • The judgment made by the trainer/assessor is benchmarked* with colleagues or industry experts
  • There is sufficient evidence to support the judgment of the trainer/assessor and
  • Whether the requirements of the Training Package or accredited course have been met.
Typical benchmarks used during the validation process include:
  • National training package which are developed by Skills Service Organisations (SSOs)/ Industry Reference Committees (IRCs) and can be found on the training.gov.au website.
  • Units of competency which consist of competency standards and need to be unpacked so that those validating the assessments can compare the actual competency against the tools being validated.
  • Industry standards and consultation will vary, and these standards form the basis of the skills and knowledge required to perform work roles.
  • AQF Guidelines and Framework
  • Information to candidates, assessors and third parties
  • Legislation relevant to the assessment such as privacy, health and safety, and anti-discrimination, copyright law and so on.
The process of bringing assessment judgements and standards into alignment. It is a process that ensures the same standards are applied to all assessment results within the same Unit(s) of Competency. It is an active process in the sense that adjustments to assessor judgements are made to overcome differences in the difficulty of the tool and/or the severity of judgements. Aims to ensure assessors have a common understanding of the unit requirements
Outcome: Outcome may include making recommendations for improvements to the assessment tool / assessment processes/ assessment methods or assessment products. Outcome may include making adjustments to assessor judgements
Timing/Occurrence: Validation can occur before, during or after an assessment is conducted. Validation can be pre-assessment validation or post-assessment validation. Validation is ongoing. Moderation is generally conducted before the finalisation of student results as it ensures the same decisions are applied to all assessment results within the same unit of competency.
Primary purpose Continuous improvement Bring judgements and standards into alignment
Statistically valid sample Validation includes reviewing a statistically valid sample of the assessments and making recommendations for future improvements to the assessment tool, process and/or outcomes and acting upon such recommendations. A statistically valid sample is one that is taken randomly from the set of assessment judgements being considered and that is sufficiently large that the outcomes of validation of the sample can be applied to the entire set of judgements. There are a number of online tools you can use to generate the size of your sample, one of which is located at www.raosoft.com/samplesize.html. You can find others by searching the Internet for ’statistically valid sample size’. The requirement in the Standards to undertake validation of assessment judgements does not prohibit your RTO from undertaking moderation activities, or any other process aimed at increasing the quality of assessment. (Ref: ASQA FAQ)
Ref: Adapted from “A Code of Professional Practice for Validation and Moderation”,  2009, NQC,  “Implementation Guide – Validation and Moderation”; NQC; 2009; p.8 and  ASQA FAQs 2017

Issues that may negatively affect your audit:

Your assessment does not address all requirements of the packaging rules
You do not gather sufficient valid evidence for competency assessment
inappropriate or lack of simulated environments
The authenticity of assessment, particularly in distance and online delivery.
It is vital that RTOs undertake their validation and moderation process as it is a crucial part of meeting learner’s needs and quality assurance requirements of Standard 1 and 2 of the Standards for RTOs 2015.
In meeting student’s needs and the quality assurance, RTOs are to bound by Clauses 1.9 – 1.11 of the Standards for RTOs 2015:

Clause 1.9 (Validation)

‘RTO implements a plan for ongoing systematic validation of assessment practices and judgements that includes for each training product on the RTO’s scope of registration

  1. when assessment validation will occur;

  2. which training products will be the focus of the validation;

  3. who will lead and participate in validation activities;

  4. how the outcomes of these activities will be documented and acted upon.’

Validation is a quality assurance process.

Moderation is a quality control process where assessors “moderate” their assessment decisions and come to an agreed position about competence of a candidate.

The outcome of Validation is improvement recommendations future improvements.

The outcome of moderation may be adjustments to the assessor’s decision.

Clause 1.10 requires:

Each training product is validated at least once every five years,
At least 50% of products validated within the first three years of each five year cycle.

Clause 1.11 requires:

Validation is undertaken by one or more persons who are not directly involved in the delivery and assessment of the training product being validated,
who collectively have:
current Certificate IV in Training and Assessment
vocational competencies and current industry skills relevant to the assessment being validated;
current knowledge and skills in vocational teaching and learning; and
Industry experts may be involved to ensure there is the combination of expertise set out in (a) to (c) above.

Why you need us to conduct independent validation?

We provide this service to RTO’s, TAFE’s and other educational institutions. In some cases, we have found that the validations process is non-compliant. Our experience has shown that RTOs do not comply because they do not address all requirements of the packaging rules, do not gather sufficient valid evidence for competency assessment, they do not have complaint learning and assessment resources and lack authentic assessment, particularly in distance and online delivery.
Important information if you deliver any AQF qualification or assessor skill set from the Training and Education Training Package:
From 1 January 2016, to deliver any AQF qualification or assessor skill set from the Training and Education Training Package (or its successor), your RTO must have undergone an independent validation of its assessment system, tools, processes and outcomes in accordance with the requirements contained in Schedule 2 (and the definitions of independent validation and validation).

What we will provide / do for you

We will:​
Meet with you to discuss your specific requirements and needs
Scope what you need to do and recommend a path forward
Provide qualified industry specific validation and moderation experts
Work with you to ensure your assessment system, processes, materials and practices produce valid assessment judgements
Develop or assist you in writing and implementing your quality policies and procedures
Develop a timetable for validating all your training products
Lead or participate in your validation team OR undertake your assessment validation on our own (depending on your requirements)
Work out a statistically valid sample size for your Post-Assessment Validation
Recommend future improvements for your training products, systems and procedures.
Provide a report for you detailing the above.
If you would like us to administer and manage the process for you, we will:
Ensure compliance in every aspect of your validation and moderation process
Assess your registered qualifications and the associated assessments for validation and moderation purposes
Develop a five (5) year validations and moderation timetable
Recommend a sample size
Prepare all documentation for distribution to participants
Prepare all record keeping documentation
Hold and moderate the meeting/s
Provide a report for you detailing the above
Recommend future improvements for your training products, systems and procedures.
Provide a report for you detailing the above.
*Only available in some industries where we have access to qualified and experienced trainers/assessors in the relevant industry.

No products in the cart.