Independent assessment validation will save you a lot of time, and allow you to access expert Industry consultants, resource validators and subject matter experts.
As per ASQA’s Standards for RTOs 2015, your RTO’s validation plan must ensure:
Did you know?
of RTOs audited by ASQA were non-compliant against Standard 1
of RTOs audited by ASQA were found non-compliant against assessment practices
of RTOs audited by ASQA were found non-compliant against having qualified and competent trainers and assessors
complaints has been received by ASQA about RTOs' assessment practices
“compliance with standards 1 Responsive to Industry and learners needs and 2 Quality assurance is noticeably lower than that for the other six standards. This is an area of concern for ASQA as these two standards relate to meeting the needs of industry and learners and ensuring the quality of training and assessment”

Source – ASQA Annual Report 2015-16, Page 55, Figure 8 Levels of compliance by standard, 1 July 2015 – 30 June 2016
https://www.asqa.gov.au/sites/g/files/net2166/f/ASQA_Annual_Report_2015-16.pdf
Validation | Moderation | |
---|---|---|
Assessment Quality/ Management Type | A quality review/continuous improvement process involving: | A quality control process involving: |
Explanation: | Checking that the assessment tools, methods, judgement, evidence and processes to ensure that the training product meet:
|
The process of bringing assessment judgements and standards into alignment. It is a process that ensures the same standards are applied to all assessment results within the same Unit(s) of Competency. It is an active process in the sense that adjustments to assessor judgements are made to overcome differences in the difficulty of the tool and/or the severity of judgements. Aims to ensure assessors have a common understanding of the unit requirements |
Outcome: | Outcome may include making recommendations for improvements to the assessment tool / assessment processes/ assessment methods or assessment products. | Outcome may include making adjustments to assessor judgements |
Timing/Occurrence: | Validation can occur before, during or after an assessment is conducted. Validation can be pre-assessment validation or post-assessment validation. Validation is ongoing. | Moderation is generally conducted before the finalisation of student results as it ensures the same decisions are applied to all assessment results within the same unit of competency. |
Primary purpose | Continuous improvement | Bring judgements and standards into alignment |
Statistically valid sample | Validation includes reviewing a statistically valid sample of the assessments and making recommendations for future improvements to the assessment tool, process and/or outcomes and acting upon such recommendations. A statistically valid sample is one that is taken randomly from the set of assessment judgements being considered and that is sufficiently large that the outcomes of validation of the sample can be applied to the entire set of judgements. There are a number of online tools you can use to generate the size of your sample, one of which is located at www.raosoft.com/samplesize.html. You can find others by searching the Internet for ’statistically valid sample size’. | The requirement in the Standards to undertake validation of assessment judgements does not prohibit your RTO from undertaking moderation activities, or any other process aimed at increasing the quality of assessment. (Ref: ASQA FAQ) |
Issues that may negatively affect your audit:
In meeting student’s needs and the quality assurance, RTOs are to bound by Clauses 1.9 – 1.11 of the Standards for RTOs 2015:
Clause 1.9 (Validation)
‘RTO implements a plan for ongoing systematic validation of assessment practices and judgements that includes for each training product on the RTO’s scope of registration
when assessment validation will occur;
which training products will be the focus of the validation;
who will lead and participate in validation activities;
how the outcomes of these activities will be documented and acted upon.’
Validation is a quality assurance process.
Moderation is a quality control process where assessors “moderate” their assessment decisions and come to an agreed position about competence of a candidate.
The outcome of Validation is improvement recommendations future improvements.
The outcome of moderation may be adjustments to the assessor’s decision.
Clause 1.10 requires:
Clause 1.11 requires:
who collectively have:
Why you need us to conduct independent validation?
Important information if you deliver any AQF qualification or assessor skill set from the Training and Education Training Package:
From 1 January 2016, to deliver any AQF qualification or assessor skill set from the Training and Education Training Package (or its successor), your RTO must have undergone an independent validation of its assessment system, tools, processes and outcomes in accordance with the requirements contained in Schedule 2 (and the definitions of independent validation and validation).
What we will provide / do for you
- Audits and Risk Management
- Validation and Moderation Services
- E-Learning
- VET Student Loan
- Business Analysis
- Course Accreditation
- RTO Services
- ELICOS Services
- CRICOS Services
- ANMAC Consultancy
- Bid & Tender Management
- Development of Business Plans
- Due Diligence
- Higher Education Provider Application and Compliance Support
- Industry Consultation
- Internal audit services and health check
- Policies and Procedures
- Preparing for and responding to external audits
- Professional development services including workshops, seminars, mentoring programs
- Research & Development
- RTO Consulting and RTO Compliance Support
- RTO Financial Viability advice and support
- RTO Rectification Services
- State and federal level funding
- Website Design
Contact Us
2/10 Lawn Court, Craigieburn,
VIC 3064